The Political Science Interpretivist

    With the right "Alignment," AI can become a Leader in the Values Revolution. But AI Alignment will fail if we ignore the 35,000-year-old Human "Bug." If you are concerned about AI Ethics and Safety , and about AI governance policy , then you probably know that the AI industry is obsessed with Alignment. We are trying to align Artificial Intelligence with "human values." But as I argue in my book, The Human Birth Defect , we are overlooking a catastrophic hardware-software mismatch in our own species. 🧠 The Hardware Failure (150,000 Years Ago): The mutation that gave us our "Big Brain" created a genetic deficit in contentment producing chemicals. We were born into a state of chronic existential restlessness. 🏹 The Software Patch (35,000 Years Ago): The "Genocidal Thrill" of the Neanderthal encounter and the subsequent slaughter  of the Great Megafauna provided the brain with its first "chemical high." This ...

    Would you agree that Operational Goodness is distinct from Moral Goodness? If so, do you think that the Operational Goodness of a functioning political system can be assessed? I argue that if the key properties of a political system were defined in ways that most political scientists would agree on, then the "performance" of any functioning political system could be measured by the degree to which it fulfilled each of the key properties in the definition of the "political system." A political scientist could observe and describe the flow of information through the system, from input to conversion into output. The feedback could also be observed and described. In other words, using the methods of Systems Theory Science, the operational "goodness" of one political system could be assessed, and then compared to the operational goodness of other political systems. They could all be ranked. Additionally, the reasons why one system performs better than ot...

The Democratic Party is Responsible for the Election of Trump 1) In the 90s they started Globalization. Like Ross Perot warned, millions of jobs were lost, leaving millions of angry ex-workers. 2) No help was given them. The Bill Clinton administration could have enacted something like the GI Bill after WWII. Instead, those out of work were left to smolder for nearly 20 years, while the Dem Billionaires got richer. 3)   Then came the 2008 crash with all its too easy to get mortgages. The Obama Dems didn't do one thing to help folks avoid foreclosure, or help after they lost their home. Instead, the Bank Bailout, passed under Bush, was implemented under Obama. Out of this came a whole lot more angry people. 4) Then the Dems cheated us out of Bernie’s candidacy in 2016. Polls showed he could have beaten Trump. This is because he spoke to those Victims of Globalization and Bankster Fraud who had become a voting block. 5) Hillary Clinton didn’t acknowledge those folks. But Trump promis...

Karl Marx was the first Democratic Socialist.  As the election of Zohran Mamdani shows, Democratic Socialism includes the belief that socialism can be realized through democratic processes , and that where this can be done No Violence is needed. Karl Marx declared over 150 years ago that “there are countries, such as America and England … where the workers may attain their goal by peaceful means.” [1] And, ironically, in a New York City newspaper, the New York World, published on July 18, 1871, Marx said “the way to show political power [in Britain] lies open to the working class. Insurrection would be madness where peaceful agitation would more swiftly and surely do the work.” [2] Then, as if prophetically describing our own times, Marx observed, “Let us sum it all up in a word. The working classes remain poor amid the increase of wealth, wretched amid the increase of luxury. Their material privation dwarfs their moral as well as their physical stature. They cannot rely on othe...

Let Google AI Answer that Question with its Own Book Review: The main argument of William J. Kelleher's book,  Normative Political Science: An Exciting New Way to Do Poli Sci Research,  is that it is possible to scientifically measure the "operational goodness" of a political system. Rather than relying on subjective moral philosophy, Kelleher proposes a method that combines two established theories to provide an objective, data-driven evaluation.  Key components of the argument 1. Integration of established theories Kelleher's methodology is based on two frameworks: David Easton's Systems Theory: This theory conceptualizes a political system in terms of inputs, processes, and outputs. The system converts demands and support from the public into policies and decisions. Kelleher uses this as a "blueprint" for a political system. Robert S. Hartman's Value Science: This formal axiology provides a framework for meas...

How does it feel to live in a time when no one is stopping a genocide? That’s the question Omar El Akkad addresses in his new book,  One Day, Everyone Will Have Always Been Against This. This book can be called a "personal memoir," as some reviewers have done, but not in a dismissive way. The author is sharing his consciousness, like in an intimate diary. He speaks to the reader as a recently naturalized citizen of the US, and as an immigrant from the Middle East (born in Egypt). He tells us about his personal experience of being baffled over how people in the West, especially in the US, can fancy themselves as exemplars of righteousness, and even supporters of the underdog, while letting their government supply a genocide. He shares his befuddlement without preaching at us. This is not a noisy protest. He doesn't rail against Israel's astonishing cruelty, nor chide the US for its complicity, but rather describes his personal experience as a person living in a world w...