Skip to main content

Bill Maher Stupidly Trashes Student Protestors

 


Bill Maher thought he was being funny when he vilified student protestors in a recent show. But he was actually doing the whole of humanity a great disservice.

I gave a much more accurate and empathic account of the main motivation of these protesters in a prior post on this blog entitled The Psychology of the Student Protests.

As an Interpretive political scientist, I observe that the cause of, or reason for, those protests is the strong sense of compassion in the students for their fellow human beings in Gaza who are suffering deeply from the merciless slaughter of their family members, friends, and neighbors.

There are many issues involved in making this observation, which I addressed in my other post on the subject. I noted that the students have erected those “encampments” as an expression of their shared feeling of urgency that the killing and suffering in Gaza be stopped now.

With over a million viewers, Maher could have helped to reduce the widespread misunderstanding of what is moving the protesters by telling his audience the truth.

A second point I made is that such misunderstanding is possible because so many people don’t have the same intense feelings as those students. In this absence of understanding, people often make up stories, or pseudo-explanations, about why the protesters are acting that way.

For example, one person I know suggested that students are attracted to the encampments by the amorous opportunities the tents provide. Well, lots of the students are in their 20s, so maybe there is a particle of truth in what he says.

But that doesn’t account for why the encampments were set up in the first place. (The same fun could be had in the dorms.) So, this seems to be a pseudo-explanation made up by my friend to appease his desire to understand what’s going on.

Bill Maher is another instance of someone who doesn’t understand the protesters, but who makes up a far less benign pseudo-explanation for their behavior. Indeed, his “explanation” is mean, malicious, sadistic, and totally wrong.

He calls them “the Hamas-backing college protesters,” who are “morally confused,” and he says they “side with the people who ruthlessly oppress women,” in other words, Muslims.

Utterly lacking in the sense of urgency the students feel for the Gazans, and incapable of understanding those feelings, Maher says they ought to protest the treatment of the women living under Sharia Law. The current protests seem so pointless and misguided to him that he thinks the students should be given a cause more worthy of their “instinct to protest social injustice.”

That’s like the passenger in the back seat of a car saying to the driver, whose on his way to the grocery store, “why don’t you go to the car wash, instead?” In other words, Bill Maher doesn’t understand the mission of the students. He can’t comprehend their urgent, even desperate, desire to see the killing and misery of their fellow human beings ended immediately.

Maher sees the same images of the suffering in Gaza, but because he lacks the compassion that drive the students, he completely fails to understand them. Instead he scolds them for “blocking Monday morning traffic.”

Maher represents the failure of communication between the protesters and much of the general public in the US today. He re-enforces the ignorance and misunderstanding of his fans.

He also contributes to the anti-protester propaganda spread by the US corporate media. The aim of this media is to serve the arms industry and other special interest lobbying orgs that benefit from, what the ICC calls, “a probable genocide.”

Unhappily, the protesters may have a long way to go before a critical mass of Americans share their compassion and then demand an immediate stop to the killing.

 

William J. Kelleher, Ph.D.

The Political Science Interpretivist

https://interpretat.blogspot.com/

@InterpretivePo1 

 

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Karl Marx was the FIRST Democratic Socialist

Karl Marx was the first Democratic Socialist.  As the election of Zohran Mamdani shows, Democratic Socialism includes the belief that socialism can be realized through democratic processes , and that where this can be done No Violence is needed. Karl Marx declared over 150 years ago that “there are countries, such as America and England … where the workers may attain their goal by peaceful means.” [1] And, ironically, in a New York City newspaper, the New York World, published on July 18, 1871, Marx said “the way to show political power [in Britain] lies open to the working class. Insurrection would be madness where peaceful agitation would more swiftly and surely do the work.” [2] Then, as if prophetically describing our own times, Marx observed, “Let us sum it all up in a word. The working classes remain poor amid the increase of wealth, wretched amid the increase of luxury. Their material privation dwarfs their moral as well as their physical stature. They cannot rely on othe...
Post a Comment
Read more

Red Roulette, by a Billionaire Chinese Crybaby

Introduction After it all, “I thought that China wasn’t as bad as Americans tended to think.” (182) That’s the conclusion of billionaire Desmond Shum, author of Red Roulette* – his autobiographical account of how he and his wife, Whitney Duan, rose from rags to riches in the go-go years of China’s developmental miracle. Whitney and the Road to Wealth Born in the late 1960s, during the Cultural Revolution, both Whitney and Desmond received a normal education as children. She then enrolled in a military university in 1986. (73) As an outstanding student, she obtained employment as an executive’s assistant in “a real estate development company run by China’s military.” (74) At the time, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) had numerous business interests, and Whitney started making connections with the elite among them. Later, the PLA was ordered to divest itself of these businesses as an anti-corruption measure by CCP General Secretary, Jiang Zemin in 1997. (75) The year before that, pe...
7 comments
Read more

RIP Prop 33 😭 What happened?

Why did Prop 33 lose in California? Here are three reasons, although there could be more:  1) Out of state billionaire real estate special interests, combined with in-state millionaire Landlord orgs, spent over $121,000,000 on telling scary falsehoods to Californians. Like, rent control will cause rents to go up, and affordable housing will disappear. They just needed to cause enough confusion about the meaning of Prop 33 to get the voters – even tenants! – to vote no.   2) As I explain in a vid on YouTube,* the California Legislative Analyst presented a biased and negative summary of Prop 33 in the Voter Guide. That was sent out to 22M Californians. For many voters, it was the one and only thing they would read about Prop 33. The law requires the Legislative Analyst to suggest the economic impact of a prop for both state and local gov – but only a negative view was given, and only for the state gov – “tens of millions” would be lost in tax revenues, it said. But renters w...
2 comments
Read more