Skip to main content

Regenerating the APSA with a Focus on Feelings

The Political Science Profession can be re-oriented to strive to make a better world, country by country. Political scientists all over the world can do research and writing which assesses the “Operational Goodness” of any political system.

The well-established definition of the “political system,” by David Easton, can serve as a standard, or norm, by which to assess the “goodness” of a political system, and for comparing the operational goodness of different political systems.

This approach is not a matter of moral approval or approbation, but more like an engineer assessing the operational goodness of a complex machine, like a computer.

One of the main ways for assessing the operational goodness of any political system is to find out how the people living in the system feel about it. That is, look at what Easton calls “politically relevant feelings.”

What is the actual lived experience of a system’s membership? Does that result in anger, alienation, or "political happiness"?

Only interpretive and qualitative methods, not those of positivism, can get at the truth of this. This approach makes the authentic experience of the affected people a key indicator of the system’s goodness.

If this is true, then the old “is/ought” separation can be bridged, and political scientists will have the grounds needed to rise above mere subjectivity when criticizing a political system.

Once the operational goodness of a political system has been assessed, ways to make it better can be sought.

Just as Public Health Science has lead in improving public health, so political science can take the lead in finding ways to upgrade the below par performance of any political system.

For an illustration of how a focus on feelings can be a part of method, using China as an example see,

China: Assessing the Goodness of a Political System with Chinese Characteristics

https://preprints.apsanet.org/engage/apsa/article-details/63056b2e11986c67ce43949e 

Learn more about assessing political system operational goodness at,

Normative Political Science – How to Measure the Goodness of a Political System https://doi.org/10.33774/apsa-2021-f9mvn

(Both are free, safe downloads from APSA Preprints and Cambridge University Press.)

Bill Kelleher

@InterpretivePo1

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Political Science is Widely Regarded as Irrelevant to Real Politics, What Can be Done to Reverse that View?

Let Google AI Answer that Question with its Own Book Review: The main argument of William J. Kelleher's book,  Normative Political Science: An Exciting New Way to Do Poli Sci Research,  is that it is possible to scientifically measure the "operational goodness" of a political system. Rather than relying on subjective moral philosophy, Kelleher proposes a method that combines two established theories to provide an objective, data-driven evaluation.  Key components of the argument 1. Integration of established theories Kelleher's methodology is based on two frameworks: David Easton's Systems Theory: This theory conceptualizes a political system in terms of inputs, processes, and outputs. The system converts demands and support from the public into policies and decisions. Kelleher uses this as a "blueprint" for a political system. Robert S. Hartman's Value Science: This formal axiology provides a framework for meas...
Post a Comment
Read more

Does Political Science Force Graduate Students into a Career of Irrelevancy?

Introduction       In a 2014 New York Times op ed, columnist Nicholas Kristof drew numerous defensive responses when he criticized political science for having very little “practical impact” in “the real world of politics.” [1] Rather than exercising civic leadership, political science has been most noticeably AWOL from public policy debates since WWII, he claims. And, in his view, there are “fewer public intellectuals on American university campuses today than a generation ago.” How does he account for this absence? Primarily, it is due to the academic interest in pursuing the quantitative approach in political science research. This kind of research is too often unintelligible to both the politically interested general public and the policy making community. Also, the “value neutrality” required for such studies prohibits advocacy. The pattern persists, in part, because graduate students must conform to the expectations of their professors, as a requirement ...
Post a Comment
Read more

One Day, Everyone Will Have Always Been Against This, by Omar El Akkad. A Book Review by a Fellow Traveler

How does it feel to live in a time when no one is stopping a genocide? That’s the question Omar El Akkad addresses in his new book,  One Day, Everyone Will Have Always Been Against This. This book can be called a "personal memoir," as some reviewers have done, but not in a dismissive way. The author is sharing his consciousness, like in an intimate diary. He speaks to the reader as a recently naturalized citizen of the US, and as an immigrant from the Middle East (born in Egypt). He tells us about his personal experience of being baffled over how people in the West, especially in the US, can fancy themselves as exemplars of righteousness, and even supporters of the underdog, while letting their government supply a genocide. He shares his befuddlement without preaching at us. This is not a noisy protest. He doesn't rail against Israel's astonishing cruelty, nor chide the US for its complicity, but rather describes his personal experience as a person living in a world w...
Post a Comment
Read more