Skip to main content

Regenerating the APSA with a Focus on Feelings

The Political Science Profession can be re-oriented to strive to make a better world, country by country. Political scientists all over the world can do research and writing which assesses the “Operational Goodness” of any political system.

The well-established definition of the “political system,” by David Easton, can serve as a standard, or norm, by which to assess the “goodness” of a political system, and for comparing the operational goodness of different political systems.

This approach is not a matter of moral approval or approbation, but more like an engineer assessing the operational goodness of a complex machine, like a computer.

One of the main ways for assessing the operational goodness of any political system is to find out how the people living in the system feel about it. That is, look at what Easton calls “politically relevant feelings.”

What is the actual lived experience of a system’s membership? Does that result in anger, alienation, or "political happiness"?

Only interpretive and qualitative methods, not those of positivism, can get at the truth of this. This approach makes the authentic experience of the affected people a key indicator of the system’s goodness.

If this is true, then the old “is/ought” separation can be bridged, and political scientists will have the grounds needed to rise above mere subjectivity when criticizing a political system.

Once the operational goodness of a political system has been assessed, ways to make it better can be sought.

Just as Public Health Science has lead in improving public health, so political science can take the lead in finding ways to upgrade the below par performance of any political system.

For an illustration of how a focus on feelings can be a part of method, using China as an example see,

China: Assessing the Goodness of a Political System with Chinese Characteristics

https://preprints.apsanet.org/engage/apsa/article-details/63056b2e11986c67ce43949e 

Learn more about assessing political system operational goodness at,

Normative Political Science – How to Measure the Goodness of a Political System https://doi.org/10.33774/apsa-2021-f9mvn

(Both are free, safe downloads from APSA Preprints and Cambridge University Press.)

Bill Kelleher

@InterpretivePo1

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How the “But For” Test for Causation in Law can be Adapted to Political Science

For social science, as for law, the concept of “causation” can  take on different forms. These forms of causation are “outside   the box” of the old Newtonian concept of causation. That is, a   one-on-one collision. For example, the “8 ball” in a pool game moved to the corner pocket because the cue ball struck it at the intended angle. The cue ball did that because Minnesota Fats hit the cue ball just right with his pool stick. This is a mechanistic model of causation. In that model, the list of causes prior to Minnesota Fats could go back endlessly; or at least to the Big Bang of 13.8 billion years ago, which, mechanistically, is thought to be the First Cause of everything. However, for the most part, social science, like law, envisions human behavior as conduct for which the actors are responsible. This need not be a “moral” responsibility, for which moral blame is attached. Instead, “causal responsibility” is simply a matter-of-fact, or practical, concept...
Post a Comment
Read more

Executive Immunity – Beyond the Hype

                                           The media and fund raising emailers are having a ball screaming “the sky is falling! The Trump Supreme Court has given Trump ‘absolute immunity’ for whatever he wants to do as President. He’ll kill us all!” But that’s far from true. The United States v Trump The case is known as US v Trump . In its opinion, the Supreme Court didn’t give Trump anything. In fact, the Court remanded the case to the District Court, and told the lawyers for both sides to start all over again. This time, they have to consider three important points. Before explaining these, lets see how the case got to the High Court. As you probably know, Trump was indicted by a Federal Grand Jury for several criminal charges alleging a conspiracy to change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election. (SCt's Opinion, page 2. All references to the Opinion.) In the...
Post a Comment
Read more

RIP Prop 33 😭 What happened?

Why did Prop 33 lose in California? Here are three reasons, although there could be more:  1) Out of state billionaire real estate special interests, combined with in-state millionaire Landlord orgs, spent over $121,000,000 on telling scary falsehoods to Californians. Like, rent control will cause rents to go up, and affordable housing will disappear. They just needed to cause enough confusion about the meaning of Prop 33 to get the voters – even tenants! – to vote no.   2) As I explain in a vid on YouTube,* the California Legislative Analyst presented a biased and negative summary of Prop 33 in the Voter Guide. That was sent out to 22M Californians. For many voters, it was the one and only thing they would read about Prop 33. The law requires the Legislative Analyst to suggest the economic impact of a prop for both state and local gov – but only a negative view was given, and only for the state gov – “tens of millions” would be lost in tax revenues, it said. But renters w...
2 comments
Read more