Skip to main content

Turning that New York Times “Hit Piece” on Neville Roy Singham, Jodie Evans, and Code Pink into Truth



The New York Times published a story on Saturday (8-5-23) that is couched in critical and disparaging undertones about Progressive philanthropist, Neville Roy Singham. This post will factor out the negative, and inject a more positive tone to the story's facts. 

Mr. Singham, whose father was a school teacher, built up his own tech company optimistically called “Thoughtworks” (get it?). In 2017, he married Jodie Evens. He was 69, she, 68.

Six months later he sold his company for $785M. The couple wanted to devote their lives and resources to benefit humanity. Jodie was already an activist. She, along with another woman, Media Benjamin, founded a peace and justice group they called “Code Pink,” in 2002. The two ladies, and their supporters, foresaw that George Bush’s lies about Iraq having Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs), was leading the nation into a completely unnecessary war. Of course, that’s what happened in February 2003, when the US invaded Iraq. They also protested against the War in Afghanistan for the entire 20 years that it lasted.

At a 2014 meeting of middle eastern countries in Cairo, Code Pink protested the mistreatment of Palestinians in Israel. Ms. Benjamin was arrested by Egyptian police, beaten, and given a dislocated shoulder.

Later in 2014, Code Pink was awarded the US Peace Prize by the US Peace Memorial Foundation "In Recognition of Inspirational Antiwar Leadership and Creative Grassroots Activism."*

Code Pink has demanded that President Joe Biden do more to negotiate a peaceful end to the war in Ukraine. For many years, the group has demanded an end to the cruel embargo that the US has imposed on Cuba.

Thanks to generous funders, like Mr. and Mrs. Singham, Code Pink, and other peace and justice groups, have been able to raise Moral Objections to all kinds of inhumane treatment of our fellow humans by our fellow humans.

The Times article notes that Mr. Singham is especially concerned that the relations between the US and China do not deteriorate into armed conflict. In his view, the people of the United States have been grossly misinformed by the US media about life in China and the intentions of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). This has resulted in the vast majority of Americans thinking that the people of China are miserable, oppressed, and unfree, and that China is a growing military threat to the US and the Free World.

Mr. Singham is quoted in the Times article as saying that he wants to help educate folks outside of China about “the miracles that China has created on the world stage.”

For example, the World Bank has issued a report finding that China has ended extreme poverty among its people. Indeed, under the leadership of the PRC and the CCP, over 800M people have been able to work together to lift themselves out of grinding poverty and into a middle class life equal to the best parts of the American middle class.^

Mr. and Mrs. Singham currently reside in Shanghai. They are working with the Chinese government to try to find ways to counteract all the negative propaganda about China in countries all over the world. Their belief is that if people understood China more as it really is, and less as an Evil and Demonic threat, the prospects for World Peace would be much better than they are today.

William J. Kelleher, PhD

References:

New York Times, Saturday, August 5, 2023. (Front page, below the fold.)

*Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_Pink

^ For sources, see Re-interpreting the Meaning of China for the USA

https://interpretat.blogspot.com/2022/02/re-interpreting-meaning-of-china-for-usa.html

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Karl Marx was the FIRST Democratic Socialist

Karl Marx was the first Democratic Socialist.  As the election of Zohran Mamdani shows, Democratic Socialism includes the belief that socialism can be realized through democratic processes , and that where this can be done No Violence is needed. Karl Marx declared over 150 years ago that “there are countries, such as America and England … where the workers may attain their goal by peaceful means.” [1] And, ironically, in a New York City newspaper, the New York World, published on July 18, 1871, Marx said “the way to show political power [in Britain] lies open to the working class. Insurrection would be madness where peaceful agitation would more swiftly and surely do the work.” [2] Then, as if prophetically describing our own times, Marx observed, “Let us sum it all up in a word. The working classes remain poor amid the increase of wealth, wretched amid the increase of luxury. Their material privation dwarfs their moral as well as their physical stature. They cannot rely on othe...
Post a Comment
Read more

Red Roulette, by a Billionaire Chinese Crybaby

Introduction After it all, “I thought that China wasn’t as bad as Americans tended to think.” (182) That’s the conclusion of billionaire Desmond Shum, author of Red Roulette* – his autobiographical account of how he and his wife, Whitney Duan, rose from rags to riches in the go-go years of China’s developmental miracle. Whitney and the Road to Wealth Born in the late 1960s, during the Cultural Revolution, both Whitney and Desmond received a normal education as children. She then enrolled in a military university in 1986. (73) As an outstanding student, she obtained employment as an executive’s assistant in “a real estate development company run by China’s military.” (74) At the time, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) had numerous business interests, and Whitney started making connections with the elite among them. Later, the PLA was ordered to divest itself of these businesses as an anti-corruption measure by CCP General Secretary, Jiang Zemin in 1997. (75) The year before that, pe...
7 comments
Read more

RIP Prop 33 😭 What happened?

Why did Prop 33 lose in California? Here are three reasons, although there could be more:  1) Out of state billionaire real estate special interests, combined with in-state millionaire Landlord orgs, spent over $121,000,000 on telling scary falsehoods to Californians. Like, rent control will cause rents to go up, and affordable housing will disappear. They just needed to cause enough confusion about the meaning of Prop 33 to get the voters – even tenants! – to vote no.   2) As I explain in a vid on YouTube,* the California Legislative Analyst presented a biased and negative summary of Prop 33 in the Voter Guide. That was sent out to 22M Californians. For many voters, it was the one and only thing they would read about Prop 33. The law requires the Legislative Analyst to suggest the economic impact of a prop for both state and local gov – but only a negative view was given, and only for the state gov – “tens of millions” would be lost in tax revenues, it said. But renters w...
2 comments
Read more