Skip to main content

The Liberator of El Salvador - Newly Re-elected Nayib Bukele (a Short Bio)

El Salvador had its national elections on Sunday, Feb 4th. The Great Nayib Bukele (“boo-kelly”) won a second term.  Small wonder, as according to a variety of pollsters, his approval ratings have been in the 90s throughout his first 5 year term. In other words, his people Love him! (Biden’s ratings range between 30% and 40%.) 

In something like California’s system, the winning candidate has to get a majority of the vote or the election will go to a runoff in March, but that won't be necessary because Bukele won by a landslide. Official count not in yet, but could be over 80%.  

Internet Voting was used for Salvadorans living outside the country. There are around 800,000 registered to vote abroad (about 6M in country). Most of them live in the US, especially in California and Texas. For those who had not registered to vote online, there were about a dozen voting centers set up in several US cities. For the Los Angeles area, three voting centers were set up. Every one of them had long lines of folks who were happy to vote. If you have Z (formerly Twitter) you can see vids. Go to this page and scroll down to Feb 4th posts,   https://twitter.com/WilliamJKelleh1

Unlike the highly decentralized election administration of the USA, in El Salvador elections are conducted by a single agency with independence from the government; the Supreme Electoral Tribunal of El Salvador. (In Canada, “Elections Canada” is the non-partisan agency responsible for administering Canadian federal elections and referendums.) The El Salvador agency is widely regarded as honest and transparent. To facilitate participation, same day registration was provided at the voting centers.

One reason why I say “the Great” Bukele is that he has accomplished an AMAZING Humanitarian Achievement. In just 5 years he has Liberated the Salvadorian people from the terror, oppression, and exploitation wrought upon them by violent gangs. For decades these gangs, funded by selling illegal drugs and extorting local businesses, operated with impunity. Through bribery and intimidation, these gangs “owned” the government.  

The government consisted of two major political parties, ARENA and the FMLN (see Ref below). In 2019, Bukele, who had been the mayor of San Salvador, campaigned on the promise to rid the people of this scourge. He had to start a third party because the two majors were in cahoots with the gangs, and they wouldn’t allow him to run in their name.  

In a free and fair election he won his first term by 54% of the vote in the first round of voting. 

El Salvador once had one of the highest murder rates in the world. Now, its murder rate is lower than that in the United States. Bukele has worked diligently to clean all the corruption out of the legislature and judiciary. Of course, he has had to overcome resistance. While there are still pockets of corruption, the people love him because he has delivered on his promises.  

His political enemies, many funded by Columbian Drug Lords, are experts at disseminating propaganda designed to make Bukele appear as a ruthless dictator. For instance, they say his re-election is unconstitutional. Not true. In 2021, the country’s Supreme Court (now free of corrupt judges) ruled that one of the articles in the Constitution allows the president, who serves a five-year term, to run for reelection once.

Phony “human rights advocates,” as well as gullible idealists, accuse the Bukele administration of violating human rights, and the due process of law. But they conveniently disregard the full context.

Gang members are known by the tattoos all over their neck and face. El Salvador law allows the use of the military for emergencies within the country. Thus, Bukele used the uncorrupted parts of the military to sweep the streets of gang members and put them behind bars until they can prove their innocence. His administration built a new prison to hold 40,000 prisoners. Its now full. 

As a result of these actions, children can walk to school without fear of being taken and forced to join a gang, or to sell dope, or to prostitute themselves. Families can go to the park, or a movie without fear. Business owners can keep their profits.

As the voting turnout shows, many Salvadorians feel that the HUGE improvement in the quality of life made by Bukele's firm governing easily justifies the technical breaches of those philosophical ideals.  This is why Bukele has a 90%+ approval rating, and why he was awarded a second term by his people. He is the most popular president in El Salvador’s history. Time magazine listed him as one of the most influential people of 2021.  

Nevertheless, in February 2021, Bukele and his family visited the United States, and asked to meet with President Joe Biden, but Biden refused to meet Bukele.   

William J. Kelleher, Ph.D.        

@InterpretivePo1

Bukele is of Spanish Arab descent. His father was a Christian who later converted to Islam.

His maternal grandfather is a Sephardic Jew. His wife is a practicing Christian. He doesn’t identify with any organized religion, but says he believes in some kind of god.

Pic from: Nayib Armando Bukele Ortez

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nayib_Bukele

 

References

RE: Bukele’s popularity:

https://elsalvadorinfo.net/nayib-bukele-approval-rate/ and Time, https://time.com/collection/100-most-influential-people-2021/6096024/nayib-bukele/

RE: Biden’s snub:

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/biden-officials-turn-down-unannounced-visit-el-salvador-pres-nayib-n1257160

RE: current elections, see the article in The Fresno Bee, by MarĂ­a G. Ortiz-Briones at,

https://www.fresnobee.com/news/local/article284686536.html

The Politics of El Salvador

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_of_El_Salvador

Bukele’s Third Party – Nuevas Ideas (New Ideas)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuevas_Ideas

Crime in El Salvador

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_El_Salvador



 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How Reappraising David Easton can make Political Science Research more Exciting.

D avid Easton’s theory of the political system has long been  misrepresented  as requiring a mechanistic theory of causation, thus dehumanizing political behavior. The widespread claim that his vision was of the political system as striving for equilibrium is totally false.   Easton was a humanist. He envisioned human political behavior as a consequence of the meanings people create volitionally in their own minds and social context. He rejected the automaton theory of political behavior.     He also understood the relationship between system performance and public opinion and sentience. A well operating system will likely result in public satisfaction and support. Poor operation, the opposite.   That, in turn, implies a  standard,  or norm, by which to assess how well a political system is performing. Indeed, Easton's theory of the empirical political system can also be used as a way to assess how well a political system is operating. Efficiency and effectiveness are elements to b

Causation, Not Correlation, in Interpretive Political Science

Using David Easton’s theory of the political system as my interpretive framework, in this post I will offer a non-mechanistic theory of how human political behavior can be “caused.” I will argue that, for Interpretive Political Science, reasons can be causes of political behavior. Indeed, respect for the subject matter – human political behavior – requires this causal theory. After all, people are not machines. “Reasons” will be understood as units of meaning in the minds of people. I will offer examples of such causal relations in the operations of two political systems, China and Peru. Hypothesis: The operation of a political system will tend to provide reasons which explain the political sentience of the public. A well-functioning political system will probably be the reason for high approval ratings among its membership. Likewise, a poorly functioning system will probably be the reason for low approval ratings. China In the past 40 years the Chinese political system hel

Does Political Science Force Graduate Students into a Career of Irrelevancy?

Introduction In a 2014 New York Times op ed, columnist Nicholas Kristof drew numerous defensive responses when he criticized political science for having very little “practical impact” in “the real world of politics.” [1] Rather than exercising civic leadership, political science has been most noticeably AWOL from public policy debates since WWII, he claims. And, in his view, there are “fewer public intellectuals on American university campuses today than a generation ago.” How does he account for this absence? Primarily, it is due to the academic interest in pursuing the quantitative approach in political science research. This kind of research is too often unintelligible to both the politically interested general public and the policy making community. Also, the “value neutrality” required for such studies prohibits advocacy. The pattern persists, in part, because graduate students must conform to the expectations of their professors, as a requirement for a successful academic