Skip to main content

One Day, Everyone Will Have Always Been Against This, by Omar El Akkad. A Book Review by a Fellow Traveler

How does it feel to live in a time when no one is stopping a genocide?

That’s the question Omar El Akkad addresses in his new book, One Day, Everyone Will Have Always Been Against This.



This book can be called a "personal memoir," as some reviewers have done, but not in a dismissive way. The author is sharing his consciousness, like in an intimate diary. He speaks to the reader as a recently naturalized citizen of the US, and as an immigrant from the Middle East (born in Egypt).

He tells us about his personal experience of being baffled over how people in the West, especially in the US, can fancy themselves as exemplars of righteousness, and even supporters of the underdog, while letting their government supply a genocide. He shares his befuddlement without preaching at us. This is not a noisy protest. He doesn't rail against Israel's astonishing cruelty, nor chide the US for its complicity, but rather describes his personal experience as a person living in a world where a genocide proceeds unhampered by any other country.

He does side with those who protest. He admires those courageous students building encampments to protest the genocide in Gaza. He understands that harms may be done to some of their careers because of their public expressions of moral anguish and outrage. Indeed, an agreement to make a movie based on his novel, American War, was canceled, at least in part, because of his public protest against the genocide. Actor friends had suffered similar harms to their careers. For speaking out against the genocide, people of heightened moral sensitivities are unjustly labeled “antisemitic.” While not using the term, he recognizes that the New McCarthyism has had numerous victims.

But, in his view, authentic moral sensitivity sometimes demands self-sacrifice, even though that is contrary to the American philosophy of self-interest.

What he finds incomprehensible is the vast majority of moral duds, in and out of government, who just let the genocide grind along. Without effective political pressure intervening, it seems that the only way it will end is when there is nobody left to kill, and nothing left to destroy. (He doesn’t say this, but the actual world we are living in today makes a mockery of Stephen Pinker’s Pollyannish celebration of humanity’s “great” moral progress, made in The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined, written before the genocide in Gaza.)

Throughout the book, I felt that Omar El Akkad is a kindred spirit. In this sense, the book was comforting for me. I too am deeply disturbed at the indifference the Western world, especially the US, shows towards the awful suffering of those human beings in Gaza. While I would describe my experience differently, and probably with less measure, getting an in-depth insight into the way in which Omar is baffled by the realities of the present shows me that I’m not alone in my own dismay.

I have two mild criticisms of the book. The first is that, unlike John Mearsheimer or Jeffery Sachs, Omar seems unaware of the power the Zionist Lobby has over the US, and other, governments. That’s never mentioned. Secondly, and unfortunately, the book does nothing to relieve my feelings of helplessness as first a Democratic administration, and then a Republican administration, showers Israel with arms and money, and unconditional encouragement to do as it pleases.

Clearly, there is no happy ending to this book. But it is an eloquent expression of a mind stunned by living in the moral desert we call “America.” I’m glad to have such companionship.

William J. Kelleher, PhD

#Gaza #GazaGenocide #Israel #Books

@WilliamJKelleh1

@drwjk.bsky.social

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Karl Marx was the FIRST Democratic Socialist

Karl Marx was the first Democratic Socialist.  As the election of Zohran Mamdani shows, Democratic Socialism includes the belief that socialism can be realized through democratic processes , and that where this can be done No Violence is needed. Karl Marx declared over 150 years ago that “there are countries, such as America and England … where the workers may attain their goal by peaceful means.” [1] And, ironically, in a New York City newspaper, the New York World, published on July 18, 1871, Marx said “the way to show political power [in Britain] lies open to the working class. Insurrection would be madness where peaceful agitation would more swiftly and surely do the work.” [2] Then, as if prophetically describing our own times, Marx observed, “Let us sum it all up in a word. The working classes remain poor amid the increase of wealth, wretched amid the increase of luxury. Their material privation dwarfs their moral as well as their physical stature. They cannot rely on othe...
Post a Comment
Read more

Red Roulette, by a Billionaire Chinese Crybaby

Introduction After it all, “I thought that China wasn’t as bad as Americans tended to think.” (182) That’s the conclusion of billionaire Desmond Shum, author of Red Roulette* – his autobiographical account of how he and his wife, Whitney Duan, rose from rags to riches in the go-go years of China’s developmental miracle. Whitney and the Road to Wealth Born in the late 1960s, during the Cultural Revolution, both Whitney and Desmond received a normal education as children. She then enrolled in a military university in 1986. (73) As an outstanding student, she obtained employment as an executive’s assistant in “a real estate development company run by China’s military.” (74) At the time, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) had numerous business interests, and Whitney started making connections with the elite among them. Later, the PLA was ordered to divest itself of these businesses as an anti-corruption measure by CCP General Secretary, Jiang Zemin in 1997. (75) The year before that, pe...
7 comments
Read more

RIP Prop 33 😭 What happened?

Why did Prop 33 lose in California? Here are three reasons, although there could be more:  1) Out of state billionaire real estate special interests, combined with in-state millionaire Landlord orgs, spent over $121,000,000 on telling scary falsehoods to Californians. Like, rent control will cause rents to go up, and affordable housing will disappear. They just needed to cause enough confusion about the meaning of Prop 33 to get the voters – even tenants! – to vote no.   2) As I explain in a vid on YouTube,* the California Legislative Analyst presented a biased and negative summary of Prop 33 in the Voter Guide. That was sent out to 22M Californians. For many voters, it was the one and only thing they would read about Prop 33. The law requires the Legislative Analyst to suggest the economic impact of a prop for both state and local gov – but only a negative view was given, and only for the state gov – “tens of millions” would be lost in tax revenues, it said. But renters w...
2 comments
Read more