Saida Mirziyoyeva – Future Leader of Uzbekistan?

Saida Mirziyoyeva delivered the address for her country, Uzbekistan, to the 81st UN General Assembly on September 24, 2026.*
She’s an impressive future leader!

Well educated, and clearly smart. She studied at the University of World Economy and Diplomacy, Moscow State University, and Tashkent State University of Law, where both Civil Law and Common Law are taught.

She’s also an impressive speaker. She seems to have not used her notes or teleprompter.

She’s the Chief of Staff for the President – her father. He has done very well for Uzbekistan. She cited the stats. Health, education, longevity, “nearly 10 million people were lifted out of poverty”

While Islam is the main religion, their new international commercial court will be based on the principles of English law.

Women’s aspirations to success are not being curtailed. As Sadia says, “Today, women make 39% of our parliament.” Think of neighboring Afghanistan!

Her values are good – “all of us want to live in a world where human dignity is the highest priority.” The accomplishments of the country are consistent with that claim.

Looks like Uzbekistan is going to continue its already well developed progress of modernity.

She'll be 42 in November -- a beautiful lady!

William J. Kelleher, Ph.D.

@InterpretivePo1

* 'Which side do you choose?' Uzbekistan’s Top Official Stuns UN on Inaction On War. NDTV Worldhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VnJPmsTiSXs

Comments

Red Roulette, by a Billionaire Chinese Crybaby

Introduction After it all, “I thought that China wasn’t as bad as Americans tended to think.” (182) That’s the conclusion of billionaire Desmond Shum, author of Red Roulette* – his autobiographical account of how he and his wife, Whitney Duan, rose from rags to riches in the go-go years of China’s developmental miracle. Whitney and the Road to Wealth Born in the late 1960s, during the Cultural Revolution, both Whitney and Desmond received a normal education as children. She then enrolled in a military university in 1986. (73) As an outstanding student, she obtained employment as an executive’s assistant in “a real estate development company run by China’s military.” (74) At the time, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) had numerous business interests, and Whitney started making connections with the elite among them. Later, the PLA was ordered to divest itself of these businesses as an anti-corruption measure by CCP General Secretary, Jiang Zemin in 1997. (75) The year before that, pe...

Karl Marx was the FIRST Democratic Socialist

Karl Marx was the first Democratic Socialist. As the election of Zohran Mamdani shows, Democratic Socialism includes the belief that socialism can be realized through democratic processes , and that where this can be done No Violence is needed. Karl Marx declared over 150 years ago that “there are countries, such as America and England … where the workers may attain their goal by peaceful means.” [1] And, ironically, in a New York City newspaper, the New York World, published on July 18, 1871, Marx said “the way to show political power [in Britain] lies open to the working class. Insurrection would be madness where peaceful agitation would more swiftly and surely do the work.” [2] Then, as if prophetically describing our own times, Marx observed, “Let us sum it all up in a word. The working classes remain poor amid the increase of wealth, wretched amid the increase of luxury. Their material privation dwarfs their moral as well as their physical stature. They cannot rely on othe...

RIP Prop 33 😭 What happened?

Why did Prop 33 lose in California? Here are three reasons, although there could be more: 1) Out of state billionaire real estate special interests, combined with in-state millionaire Landlord orgs, spent over $121,000,000 on telling scary falsehoods to Californians. Like, rent control will cause rents to go up, and affordable housing will disappear. They just needed to cause enough confusion about the meaning of Prop 33 to get the voters – even tenants! – to vote no. 2) As I explain in a vid on YouTube,* the California Legislative Analyst presented a biased and negative summary of Prop 33 in the Voter Guide. That was sent out to 22M Californians. For many voters, it was the one and only thing they would read about Prop 33. The law requires the Legislative Analyst to suggest the economic impact of a prop for both state and local gov – but only a negative view was given, and only for the state gov – “tens of millions” would be lost in tax revenues, it said. But renters w...

The Political Science Interpretivist

Search This Blog