Skip to main content

If Political Science is Widely Regarded as Irrelevant to Real Politics, What Can be Done to Reverse that View?

Let Google AI Answer that Question with its Own Book Review:

The main argument of William J. Kelleher's book, Normative Political Science: An Exciting New Way to Do Poli Sci Research, is that it is possible to scientifically measure the "operational goodness" of a political system. Rather than relying on subjective moral philosophy, Kelleher proposes a method that combines two established theories to provide an objective, data-driven evaluation. 

Key components of the argument

1. Integration of established theories

Kelleher's methodology is based on two frameworks:

  • David Easton's Systems Theory: This theory conceptualizes a political system in terms of inputs, processes, and outputs. The system converts demands and support from the public into policies and decisions. Kelleher uses this as a "blueprint" for a political system.
  • Robert S. Hartman's Value Science: This formal axiology provides a framework for measuring the "goodness" of things by assessing how well a specimen fulfills the conceptual definition of its category. 

2. Assessing "operational goodness"

By combining Easton and Hartman, Kelleher argues that the "operational goodness" of a political system can be measured by comparing its actual performance against the conceptual expectations laid out in Easton's model. This allows political scientists to: 

  • Rate and compare systems: Systems can be rated as "excellent," "adequate," or "poor," and compared to other systems.
  • Pinpoint dysfunctions: The method helps identify exactly where a system is failing to meet its operational specifications, highlighting specific dysfunctions. 

3. Incorporation of public opinion

The book recognizes that unlike a mechanical system, a political system's "operational goodness" must also account for the human element. Public opinion regarding the system's performance is used as an additional measure, with well-functioning systems likely to receive supportive attitudes and vice versa. 

4. Prescription of remedial policies

By identifying system deficiencies based on scientific observation rather than moral judgment, the approach shifts political science toward an applied, problem-solving discipline. 

  • Proposing solutions: Political scientists can suggest remedial policies to address diagnosed problems, improving the system's operation.
  • Raising the profession's standing: This provides a pathway for political science to be seen as a reliable source of public policy wisdom, potentially raising the profession's standing. 

The bridge between "is" and "ought"

Ultimately, Kelleher's book seeks to bridge the traditional gap between descriptive (empirical) and prescriptive (normative) political science. By using empirical observations to determine how well the "ought" of the political system is being fulfilled, he proposes a method for deriving practical policy solutions from scientific analysis. 

The above is Google AI's exact answer to this question, What are the main arguments in the book, Normative Political Science, by William Kelleher?

William J. Kelleher, PhD

"Together, we can make Political Science better!"

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

RIP Prop 33 😭 What happened?

Why did Prop 33 lose in California? Here are three reasons, although there could be more:  1) Out of state billionaire real estate special interests, combined with in-state millionaire Landlord orgs, spent over $121,000,000 on telling scary falsehoods to Californians. Like, rent control will cause rents to go up, and affordable housing will disappear. They just needed to cause enough confusion about the meaning of Prop 33 to get the voters – even tenants! – to vote no.   2) As I explain in a vid on YouTube,* the California Legislative Analyst presented a biased and negative summary of Prop 33 in the Voter Guide. That was sent out to 22M Californians. For many voters, it was the one and only thing they would read about Prop 33. The law requires the Legislative Analyst to suggest the economic impact of a prop for both state and local gov – but only a negative view was given, and only for the state gov – “tens of millions” would be lost in tax revenues, it said. But renters w...
2 comments
Read more

Does Political Science Force Graduate Students into a Career of Irrelevancy?

Introduction       In a 2014 New York Times op ed, columnist Nicholas Kristof drew numerous defensive responses when he criticized political science for having very little “practical impact” in “the real world of politics.” [1] Rather than exercising civic leadership, political science has been most noticeably AWOL from public policy debates since WWII, he claims. And, in his view, there are “fewer public intellectuals on American university campuses today than a generation ago.” How does he account for this absence? Primarily, it is due to the academic interest in pursuing the quantitative approach in political science research. This kind of research is too often unintelligible to both the politically interested general public and the policy making community. Also, the “value neutrality” required for such studies prohibits advocacy. The pattern persists, in part, because graduate students must conform to the expectations of their professors, as a requirement ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Executive Immunity – Beyond the Hype

                                           The media and fund raising emailers are having a ball screaming “the sky is falling! The Trump Supreme Court has given Trump ‘absolute immunity’ for whatever he wants to do as President. He’ll kill us all!” But that’s far from true. The United States v Trump The case is known as US v Trump . In its opinion, the Supreme Court didn’t give Trump anything. In fact, the Court remanded the case to the District Court, and told the lawyers for both sides to start all over again. This time, they have to consider three important points. Before explaining these, lets see how the case got to the High Court. As you probably know, Trump was indicted by a Federal Grand Jury for several criminal charges alleging a conspiracy to change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election. (SCt's Opinion, page 2. All references to the Opinion.) In the...
Post a Comment
Read more