Skip to main content

The Democratic Party is Responsible for the Election of Trump

1) In the 90s they started Globalization. Like Ross Perot warned, millions of jobs were lost, leaving millions of angry ex-workers.

2) No help was given them. The Bill Clinton administration could have enacted something like the GI Bill after WWII. Instead, those out of work were left to smolder for nearly 20 years, while the Dem Billionaires got richer.

3) Then came the 2008 crash with all its too easy to get mortgages. The Obama Dems didn't do one thing to help folks avoid foreclosure, or help after they lost their home. Instead, the Bank Bailout, passed under Bush, was implemented under Obama. Out of this came a whole lot more angry people.

4) Then the Dems cheated us out of Bernie’s candidacy in 2016. Polls showed he could have beaten Trump. This is because he spoke to those Victims of Globalization and Bankster Fraud who had become a voting block.

5) Hillary Clinton didn’t acknowledge those folks. But Trump promised them revenge, and got their votes in 2016. He made the same promise in 2024. The Victims of Globalization and Bankster Fraud, as angry and worse off as ever, gave him a Mandate to Break Stuff. This time he had the Project 2025 authors to tell him how to do that. Their program included terrorizing immigrants who had long been blamed for the losses of jobs, deflecting attention from the Dem, and Repub, Billionaires.

Today's Democratic Party is OWNED by Billionaires. They will only allow so much "resistance" to Trump and “reform” as squares with their financial interests. I.e., the Democratic Party can't and won't buck up against their Super Rich owners - individual officials couldn't get re-elected if they tried that.

Only a Party committed to the principles of Marxist Humanism can be relied upon to lead the way to real reform. The Party of Sanders, AOC, Mamdani, and others. The Party started by the Marxist Humanist, Michael Harrington, the Democratic Socialists of America can be trusted to stay on the right path.

So, start a branch in your neighborhood today!

William J. Kelleher, Ph.D.
The Political Science Interpretivist
Marxist Humanist

 

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Red Roulette, by a Billionaire Chinese Crybaby

Introduction After it all, “I thought that China wasn’t as bad as Americans tended to think.” (182) That’s the conclusion of billionaire Desmond Shum, author of Red Roulette* – his autobiographical account of how he and his wife, Whitney Duan, rose from rags to riches in the go-go years of China’s developmental miracle. Whitney and the Road to Wealth Born in the late 1960s, during the Cultural Revolution, both Whitney and Desmond received a normal education as children. She then enrolled in a military university in 1986. (73) As an outstanding student, she obtained employment as an executive’s assistant in “a real estate development company run by China’s military.” (74) At the time, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) had numerous business interests, and Whitney started making connections with the elite among them. Later, the PLA was ordered to divest itself of these businesses as an anti-corruption measure by CCP General Secretary, Jiang Zemin in 1997. (75) The year before that, pe...
7 comments
Read more

Karl Marx was the FIRST Democratic Socialist

Karl Marx was the first Democratic Socialist.  As the election of Zohran Mamdani shows, Democratic Socialism includes the belief that socialism can be realized through democratic processes , and that where this can be done No Violence is needed. Karl Marx declared over 150 years ago that “there are countries, such as America and England … where the workers may attain their goal by peaceful means.” [1] And, ironically, in a New York City newspaper, the New York World, published on July 18, 1871, Marx said “the way to show political power [in Britain] lies open to the working class. Insurrection would be madness where peaceful agitation would more swiftly and surely do the work.” [2] Then, as if prophetically describing our own times, Marx observed, “Let us sum it all up in a word. The working classes remain poor amid the increase of wealth, wretched amid the increase of luxury. Their material privation dwarfs their moral as well as their physical stature. They cannot rely on othe...
Post a Comment
Read more