Skip to main content

Normative Political Science: An Exciting New Way to do Poli Sci Research - A Book Summary

 

 


Introduction

Chapter One: David Easton is an Interpretivist

Chapter Two: The First Behavioral Political System - An Origins Story

Chapter Three: What is the Good Political System?

Chapter Four: China - Assessing the Operational Goodness of the Chinese Political System

Chapter Five: David Easton’s Plan for Organizing the Political Science Profession

Conclusion: An Exciting Future of Research

BOOK SUMMARY

This book shows how to make Political Science relevant to any government’s policy making process. That begins with defining, for the first time ever, what makes a “good political system.”

David Easton’s well known theory of the political system is descriptive; that is, it tells us what the elements of a political system are: input, conversion, output, and feedback, in a political environment.

Now, that description has been transformed into a specific standard for assessing a functioning political system’s Operational Goodness.

An engineer can assess the operational goodness of a car, or any machine, by comparing the way it works with the blueprint specs for it. A well-functioning machine is one that fulfills the specifications for its operation. If a machine is not operating well, an inspection can be made to find out which specs are not being met.

Likewise, the operational goodness of any political system can be assessed by comparing the way it actually functions to the ideal set for it by Easton’s definition. While every political system is unique, to be classified as a “political system” each must have some form of the constituent elements as defined by Easton. Each element directs research into how well the functions are being fulfilled.

The operating specifications for a well-functioning political system are spelled-out in the book. A researcher could look into, for example, how smoothly information is flowing from the input function into the conversion, and then the output, functions. Feedback studies would include surveying public satisfaction with their political system.

Assessing the degree to which a political system fulfills the Easton norm for it will enable researchers to pin point causes of misfunction, malfunction, and public unhappiness. This is the purpose of Pure Research for political science. Building on those studies, Applied Research in political science could suggest specific improvements for enabling a political system to raise its level of operational goodness. The ultimate result would be an increase of the Political Happiness of the system’s members.

If political science research can help improve system operations, and thus increase public satisfaction with their life experience in the system, public respect for the profession will rise to, or exceed, that once given the NIH or the WHO.

William J. Kelleher, Ph.D.

The Political Science Interpretivist

@InterpretivePo1 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Does Political Science Force Graduate Students into a Career of Irrelevancy?

Introduction       In a 2014 New York Times op ed, columnist Nicholas Kristof drew numerous defensive responses when he criticized political science for having very little “practical impact” in “the real world of politics.” [1] Rather than exercising civic leadership, political science has been most noticeably AWOL from public policy debates since WWII, he claims. And, in his view, there are “fewer public intellectuals on American university campuses today than a generation ago.” How does he account for this absence? Primarily, it is due to the academic interest in pursuing the quantitative approach in political science research. This kind of research is too often unintelligible to both the politically interested general public and the policy making community. Also, the “value neutrality” required for such studies prohibits advocacy. The pattern persists, in part, because graduate students must conform to the expectations of their professors, as a requirement ...
Post a Comment
Read more

RIP Prop 33 😭 What happened?

Why did Prop 33 lose in California? Here are three reasons, although there could be more:  1) Out of state billionaire real estate special interests, combined with in-state millionaire Landlord orgs, spent over $121,000,000 on telling scary falsehoods to Californians. Like, rent control will cause rents to go up, and affordable housing will disappear. They just needed to cause enough confusion about the meaning of Prop 33 to get the voters – even tenants! – to vote no.   2) As I explain in a vid on YouTube,* the California Legislative Analyst presented a biased and negative summary of Prop 33 in the Voter Guide. That was sent out to 22M Californians. For many voters, it was the one and only thing they would read about Prop 33. The law requires the Legislative Analyst to suggest the economic impact of a prop for both state and local gov – but only a negative view was given, and only for the state gov – “tens of millions” would be lost in tax revenues, it said. But renters w...
2 comments
Read more

If Political Science is Widely Regarded as Irrelevant to Real Politics, What Can be Done to Reverse that View?

Let Google AI Answer that Question with its Own Book Review: The main argument of William J. Kelleher's book,  Normative Political Science: An Exciting New Way to Do Poli Sci Research,  is that it is possible to scientifically measure the "operational goodness" of a political system. Rather than relying on subjective moral philosophy, Kelleher proposes a method that combines two established theories to provide an objective, data-driven evaluation.  Key components of the argument 1. Integration of established theories Kelleher's methodology is based on two frameworks: David Easton's Systems Theory: This theory conceptualizes a political system in terms of inputs, processes, and outputs. The system converts demands and support from the public into policies and decisions. Kelleher uses this as a "blueprint" for a political system. Robert S. Hartman's Value Science: This formal axiology provides a framework for meas...
Post a Comment
Read more